This is an Organization Research on Bones and Dental Implants.
Replacing one fixture with OSSTEOBIONICS STR fixture
Get link
Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
-
I used the STR fixture. It is 4.5 mm in diameter and 10 mm long. This is a case of removing a fixture that had been used for a long time, waiting, and then placing it with a delay.
I am currently a 55-year-old male. My oral condition has worsened over the past four years. She planned extraction of the entire maxilla and fixed prosthetics using implants. First, the tooth was extracted and a temporary denture was installed. Looking at the healing pattern. Loss of buccal alveolar bone is seen. The inferior basilar bone is rather exostotic. There appears to be sufficient bone mass available. OssteoBionics' SBA implant was placed and submerged. We were able to obtain sufficient initial fixation for fixed temporary prosthesis. To evaluate the bone response of the SBA implant, a two-stage surgery was performed. Autogenous bone, xenogeneic bone, and synthetic bone were transplanted into the surrounding defect area. This is what it looks like after the second surgery. The bone response is very good, a ll bone graft materials used were well maintained around the implant. This is what it looks like after the final prosthetics. I am a little dissatisfied with the s
Here's a case of a 70-year-old male patient Implantation was immediately planted in area 46. Normal healing abutment was installed after SB bone level fixture was implantated in the usual way. However, the radiation shot indicates that the healing abutment is not completely locked. In this case, if you lock it with OSSTEO BIONICS' Bone Healing Abutment, you can easily see it locked without interference from the adjacent bone. I think this type of healing is very convenient for immediate implantation or GBR. It makes soft tissue more comfortable and fits well without interference from neighboring bones. It's a month before the final prosthesis. We change the abutment to the type of healing abutment that is needed. This is the final prosthesis shot. Bone Healing Abutment seems to be advantageous for implantation for people with soft tissue like this, even during simultaneous GBR for mandibular cavity.
Today's case involves a patient who had implants placed around 20 years ago after a window approach, but the implants had to be removed due to peri-implantitis. This is a photo from before the upper right implant was placed in 2003. At that time, there was no CT scan available, and due to limited remaining bone volume, bone grafting was performed before implant placement. This year, the patient is a 65-year-old woman. This is a photo of the patient undergoing a Windows app procedure. Bio-Oss was used for bone grafting in this case. This is a photo taken after the surgery. Approximately 5 months later, the implant was placed, and the prosthesis was completed. In 2007 In 2008 In 2009 It's 2009 too. In 2011 In 2012 In 2014 In 2015 In 2017 In 2019 In 2020 And on February 3, 2022, after a long absence, the patient visited with discomfort in the area of tooth 17 and symptoms of maxillary sinusitis as shown. Based on the CT findings, there appears to be thickening of the right maxilla
Comments
Post a Comment