Concerns about nerve damage and narrow bone width during implant placement
Last week, dental implants were placed in the lower right molar area of a 61-year-old female patient.
Due to the narrow bone width, especially in the premolar area, I recommended using a bone-level implant such as the Roxolid implant.
Subsequently, implants with a diameter of 3.5mm were placed in the area of tooth #45, while the rest were 4.0mm in diameter.
Here is a post-operative photo. Fortunately, the area of tooth #47 was placed slightly towards the lingual side, avoiding any significant risk. Additionally, the implant in the other area is not perforating through the lingual cortical bone, which is a positive outcome.
Due to the narrow bone width, especially in the premolar area, I recommended using a bone-level implant such as the Roxolid implant.
However, due to cost constraints, we decided to proceed with a tissue-level implant instead.
Taking into consideration the limited mouth opening of the patient, as well as the occlusion and the relationship with the inferior alveolar nerve, a mid-face X-ray was captured.
Subsequently, implants with a diameter of 3.5mm were placed in the area of tooth #45, while the rest were 4.0mm in diameter.
The implants had a tissue-level neck of 2.8mm and a length of 8.5mm. The implant placement was accompanied by guided bone regeneration (GBR) techniques.
However, there is a concern for potential nerve damage in the area of tooth #47, contrary to initial expectations.
Fortunately, the patient is experiencing no significant side effects and is progressing well without any sensory disturbances after the surgery.
Comments
Post a Comment